Michael Monnerie wrote: > On Dienstag, 18. April 2006 17:20 Carl Chipman wrote: > >> I'm getting a bunch of these >> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.6 required=6.0 >> tests=BAYES_50: 1.567,HTML_70_80: 0.039,HTML_MESSAGE: 0.001 >> > > Your message gave me: > > X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=17.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 > tests=DRUGS_ERECTILE=0.1, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.5, > RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100=1.5, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.5, URIBL_AB_SURBL=3.306, > URIBL_BLACK=3, URIBL_OB_SURBL=2.617, URIBL_SBL=1.094, > URIBL_SC_SURBL=3.6, > URIBL_WS_SURBL=1.533 > > So you should use some SARE rules: http://rulesemporium.com >
Why should Carl use SARE rules to catche this spam? None of the rules you cite are SARE rules.. Not a single one. They're all standard SA 3.x rules, except URIBL_BLACK, which isn't from SARE, it's from uribl.com.
