> spamc -R < 2006.04.07/ham/33. -4.6/5.0 > > Détails de l'analyse du message: (-4.6 points, 5.0 requis) > 0.0 NO_REAL_NAME Le champ From: ne contient pas le nom complet de l'e xpéditeur > -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts > -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: L'algorithme Bayésien a évalué la probabilité de spam entre 0 > et 1% > [score: 0.0000] > 0.0 UPPERCASE_25_50 Message composé de 25 à 50% de majuscules > 1.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
> And i do not understand something : > > 1) why is the score negative ? The score is negative because two negative-scoring rules hit, and no positive-scoring rules hit. BAYES_00 says that the message is ham. This is -2.6 points on your system. ALL_TRUSTED indicates either that the message came from a trusted host in your network. Or quite possibly it indicates that you don't have trusted_networks set up correctly and SA is tagging all mail as trusted, lowering the score by 3.3 points. -2.6 + -3.3 = -5.9. Then add 1.3 for AWL and you get -4.6, which is what the summary line says. > 2) the mail is a ham, and the score is 4,6. So, this is not supposed to be a spam. > howerver, it's written "Ce message est probablement du SPAM" > I really do not understand this Probably a side effect of you having specified -R for report. Rep[ort is only supposed to be reporting spam, so it uses the standard header that indicates that the message is spam. If you instead did spamassassin <2006.04.07/ham/33 (or whatever the message name is) you will probably not see a spam report. If you do it again with "spamassassin -t < file" you will see the spam report, because -t says it is a test message and you want to see the spam report. Loren