> spamc -R < 2006.04.07/ham/33. -4.6/5.0
>
> Détails de l'analyse du message:   (-4.6 points, 5.0 requis)
>  0.0 NO_REAL_NAME           Le champ From: ne contient pas le nom complet
de l'e xpéditeur
> -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED            Did not pass through any untrusted hosts
> -2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: L'algorithme Bayésien a évalué la
probabilité de spam entre 0 > et 1%
>                             [score: 0.0000]
>  0.0 UPPERCASE_25_50        Message composé de 25 à 50% de majuscules
>  1.3 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

> And i do not understand something :
>
> 1) why is the score negative ?

The score is negative because two negative-scoring rules hit, and no
positive-scoring rules hit.

BAYES_00 says that the message is ham.  This is -2.6 points on your system.
ALL_TRUSTED indicates either that the message came from a trusted host in
your network.  Or quite possibly it indicates that you don't have
trusted_networks set up correctly and SA is tagging all mail as trusted,
lowering the score by 3.3 points.

-2.6 + -3.3 = -5.9. Then add 1.3 for AWL and you get -4.6, which is what the
summary line says.

> 2) the mail is a ham, and the score is 4,6. So, this is not supposed to be
a spam.
> howerver, it's written "Ce message est probablement du SPAM"
> I really do not understand this

Probably a side effect of you having specified -R for report.  Rep[ort is
only supposed to be reporting spam, so it uses the standard header that
indicates that the message is spam.

If you instead did     spamassassin <2006.04.07/ham/33  (or whatever the
message name is) you will probably not see a spam report.  If you do it
again with "spamassassin -t < file" you will see the spam report, because -t
says it is a test message and you want to see the spam report.

        Loren

Reply via email to