Greetings.

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tristan
Miller wrote:
>> The first message in that example SHOULD have triggered
>> RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL and RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL.
>> 
>> As per this header:
>> 
>> Received: from M696P000.adsl.highway.telekom.at
>> (M696P000.adsl.highway.telekom.at [62.47.246.224])
>> by mail.dfki.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 90E26E4918
>> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun,  2 Apr 2006 00:22:49 +0200 (CEST)
>> 
>> But for some reason the header not parsing or trust path is broken
>> somewhere and SA thinks that 62.47.246.224 is internal.
>> 
>> You might want to run the message through spamassassin with debugging
>> enabled and see what it has to say about the Received: parsing.
> 
> Here's what I get.  I'm surprised that it says DNS is not available. 

Duh, please ignore that.  I was running my tests with the -L (local)
parameter.  However, even without -L the mail still isn't triggering
RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL and RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL.  However, those two tests do show
up in the debug "subtests" line:

debug:
subtests=__ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA,__CT,__CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY,__CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT,__HAS_MIMEOLE,__HAS_MSGID,__HAS_MSMAIL_PRI,__HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER,__HAS_RCVD,__HAS_SUBJECT,__HAS_X_MAILER,__HAS_X_PRIORITY,__IMG_ONLY,__MIME_BASE64,__MIME_HTML,__MIME_QP,__MIME_VERSION,__MSGID_OK_HEX,__MSGID_OK_HOST,__NEXTPART_ALL,__NEXTPART_NORMAL,__NONEMPTY_BODY,__OE_MSGID_2,__OE_MUA,__OUTLOOK_DOLLARS_MSGID,__RCVD_IN_NJABL,__RCVD_IN_SORBS,__SANE_MSGID,__SARE_BODY_BLNK_5_100,__SARE_CSTRADE4,__SARE_HAS_BG_COLOR,__SARE_HEAD_MIME_VALID,__SARE_HEAD_SUBJ_RAND,__SARE_HTML_EFONT,__SARE_HTML_HAS_DIV,__SARE_HTML_HAS_FONT,__SARE_HTML_HAS_IMG,__SARE_META_MURTY3,__SARE_URI_ANY,__SARE_WHITELIST_FLAG,__SARE_WHITE_BG_COLOR,__TAG_EXISTS_BODY,__TAG_EXISTS_HEAD,__TAG_EXISTS_HTML,__TAG_EXISTS_META,__TOCC_EXISTS

What does that mean?  That the tests were performed and triggered, but not
reported because they are subsumed by some other test?

Here are the debug messages relevant to that IP:

$ spamassassin -D -t < /tmp/filing.txt 2>&1 | fgrep 62.47.246.224
debug: received-header: parsed as [ ip=62.47.246.224
rdns=M696P000.adsl.highway.telekom.at
helo=M696P000.adsl.highway.telekom.at by=mail.dfki.de ident= envfrom=
intl=0 id=90E26E4918 auth= ]
debug: received-header: relay 62.47.246.224 trusted? no internal? no
debug: metadata: X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted: [ ip=62.47.246.224
rdns=M696P000.adsl.highway.telekom.at
helo=M696P000.adsl.highway.telekom.at by=mail.dfki.de ident= envfrom=
intl=0 id=90E26E4918 auth= ] [ ip=192.168.4.59 rdns= helo=vca
by=M696P000.adsl.highway.telekom.at ident= envfrom= intl=0
id=1FPoWo-0005g8-Ka auth= ]
debug: SPF: checking HELO (helo=M696P000.adsl.highway.telekom.at,
ip=62.47.246.224)
debug: SPF: query for /62.47.246.224/telekom.at: result: none, comment:
SPF: domain of sender telekom.at does not designate mailers
debug: tokenize: header tokens for *RU = " [ ip=62.47.246.224
rdns=M696P000.adsl.highway.telekom.at
helo=M696P000.adsl.highway.telekom.at by=mail.dfki.de ident= envfrom=
intl=0 id=90E26E4918 auth= ] [ ip=192.168.4.59 rdns= helo=vca
by=M696P000.adsl.highway.telekom.at ident= envfrom= intl=0
id=1FPoWo-0005g8-Ka auth= ]"
debug: tokenize: header tokens for *r = "   [192.168.4 ip*192.168.4.59 ]
(helo=vca) by M696P000.adsl.highway.telekom.at   smtp (Exim 4.43) id
1FPoWo-0005g8-Ka;     M696P000.adsl.highway.telekom.at
(M696P000.adsl.highway.telekom.at [62.47.246 ip*62.47.246.224 ]) by
mail.dfki.de (Postfix)         <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "
debug: bayes token 'H*r:ip*62.47.246.224' => 0.978
debug: bayes token 'H*RU:62.47.246.224' => 0.978
Received: from M696P000.adsl.highway.telekom.at
(M696P000.adsl.highway.telekom.at [62.47.246.224])

Regards,
Tristan

-- 
   _
  _V.-o  Tristan Miller [en,(fr,de,ia)]  ><  Space is limited
 / |`-'  -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=  <>  In a haiku, so it's hard
(7_\\    http://www.nothingisreal.com/   ><  To finish what you

Reply via email to