On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 11:15:44AM -0600, Chris Thielen wrote: > That said, my opinion is that YES indeed this is a replacement for RDJ > in at least the SARE. I'm sorta waiting for the sa-update framework to > gel a bit more before we tackle getting the SARE rules published as > channels.
FWIW, the framework for what a channel is and how updates are published and distributed, etc, hasn't changed since sa-update was originally written 9+ months ago. (the script has been modified a bit, but not the design of a "channel") > Again, I haven't taken the time to see how sa-update is actually > implemented so I may be off base with this comment. I thought I had a document available which talked about how sa-update works, but I can't find it now, so I started work on a new wiki page (http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RuleUpdates) to talk about how to use sa-update and how to publish channels. It's still being worked on, so don't laugh if you look at it right now. :) If you have any questions, feel free to ask and that'll let me add information to the wiki doc. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "I'll have to be careful when I walk past that thing ... It'll blow the rest of my hair off." - Isadore Katz
pgpTE09iS3H0R.pgp
Description: PGP signature
