Eric W. Bates wrote: > Eric W. Bates wrote: >>> Matt Kettler wrote: >>> >>>> Eric W. Bates wrote: >>>> > > ... >>>> >>>> >>>> Maybe.. Were there any untrusted hosts in-between 68.64.105.61 and your >>>> network >>>> in the Received: headers? >>> >>> No. But even if there were, wouldn't the rule fire on the offensive IP >>> rather than the one listed as 'trusted'? >>> > > Well, I may have misspoken. 127.0.0.1 is in the path because I'm > handing off from smtpd to amavis before returning back to smtpd again:
Well you better add 127.0.0.1 to your trusted networks then..
