John, I saw several at Linux world but I think that the biggest problem is that each one will require care and feeding when the day is done. The only difference is they provide and instant on facility whereas you will need to configure you're from scratch (which equates to an extra 30 minutes or so one time).
We process a fairly large number of emails daily, with what I think is minimal hardware, and the system work almost no maintenance. Gary Wayne Smith > -----Original Message----- > From: Stewart, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 9:05 AM > To: 'users@spamassassin.apache.org' > Subject: Commercial SA packages? > > > We've been running SpamAssassin with amavisd-new for years... still on an > old version, and been meaning to update for far too long. > > The fact is, I just don't have the time to give SA proper care and > feeding. > > I know there are some commercial anti-spam packages based on SA. I'd like > to > know if anyone has opinions on their effectiveness and admin ease. We can > afford to shell out some cash if it's easy to implement and we can more or > less forget about it. > > Our environment is a postfix gateway with Exchange internally (right now > that traffic flows through the SA box to be tagged). > > Any opinions? > > thanks! > > johnS
