Rob McEwen a écrit : > and followup from me, please re*ply with NoThankYou in the subject,<br> > or click this self re*moval link: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > =3DNoThankYoualpha<br><br> > > <font color=3D"#FF0000">W*ARNING: There will be a $500 fine PER INCIDENT > for= > False Sp*am accusations,<br> > resulting in loss of bu*siness for us. This is a serious offense.<br>
Note that they say ".... false spam accusation". blockig isn't an accusation. Many people block dynamic IPs. They don't mean users of dynamic IPs are criminals! Also, $500 isn't much. I would even go and really accuse them of spam, just to see. Just provide a rejection message that refers to a web page which states that - spam attempts risk a $50K fine - some of the addresses you accept mail for are delivered to children (so they are responsible for controlling the content or getting the parents consent) - mail to your site is delivered to many countries and many states (so they can be sued even if they send from other countries if the recipient happens to be in their country)
