Title: RE: SpamAssassin tested by lwn.net

> > Michael Monnerie wrote:
> > > http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/173910/e7bf95a7cb044637/
> > >
> > > They are wondering why bayes_99 is not given 5 points by
> default, as it
> > > seems to have no FP.

Disregarding the excellent explanation JMason gave, there is also rule #1 of rule writing:

"No single rule should ever mark a messege as spam."

Numerous testing has shown that like a picture your buddies took of you while you were drunk, it will eventually come back up and bite you in the bum!

--Chris



Reply via email to