Dave Pooser wrote: > True. I'd increased the SBL score because I misunderstood how URIBL_SBL > works; I thought it was flagging sites that were hosted on SBL-listed > addresses, and I trust the SBL far more than other blacklists so I was > willing to score it higher.
Lesson to learn: Don't increase the scores without reading STATISTICS-set*.txt >From STATISTICS-set3.txt: OVERALL% SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME 22.415 31.8425 0.4370 0.986 0.49 1.64 URIBL_SBL The S/O is 0.986, which means that 1.4% of messages matching the rule were not spam. Generally speaking, SA's perceptron knows what it's doing... If you think a score needs adjusting, check the stats to see what's going on..
