This is a little off this post, but why don't I ever see
USER_IN_WHITELIST in my emails. I see the -100's affect in my
X-Spam-Status but I don't see the rule. I am running SpamAssassin via
mimedefang. Could that have something to do with it, or is there a
configuration option I have missed?
Chris Purves wrote:
Chris Purves wrote:
I am not getting SPF_ hits for most messages that I expect should pass
SPF. On one message when I run through spamassassin with debug I see:
[5959] dbg: spf: checking HELO (helo=, ip=66.111.4.28)
[5959] dbg: spf: cannot get HELO, cannot use SPF
[5959] dbg: spf: checking EnvelopeFrom (helo=, ip=66.111.4.28,
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[5959] dbg: spf: cannot get HELO, cannot use SPF
The received header looks like:
Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28])
by aurora.northfolk.ca with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1FCneI-0001Q8-Hs
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 08:51:09 +0800
I found another clue...
In one of my e-mails sent to this list, the header shows:
X-Spam-Report:
* 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO
* -1.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
But if I run the same message from a user account with spamassassin -t
< ... I get:
-100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list
0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
It looks like SPF and whitelisting (I have spamassassin set in
whitelist_from_rcvd) are not being run when SA is called from exim,
but it works when calling spamassassin manually.
Any suggestions?
--
----------------
Barton L. Phillips
Applied Technology Resources, Inc.
Tel: (818)652-9850
Web: http://www.applitec.com
