On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:12:49AM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > I think that would be fine. I'd say you should definitely continue > learning any ham mails that get a Bayes score over 70%, but otherwise > auto-learning will probably take care of things for you.
How would I know which mails have bayes score of over 70% ? One thing I alway don't understand, how do I know scores of mails which are below my required_hits? I use, http://www.gbnet.net/~jrg/qmail/ifspamh With warm regards, -Payal
