jdow wrote: > From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> But why do they so commonly overlap in NONSPAM too? And why does nobody >> care? Why does everyone insist the problem doesn't exist in spite of >> examples to the contrary. > > So what do you propose doing about it? How do you propose AVOIDING your > dreaded overlap. > >> At my site, the URBLs overlap. Period. They have overlapping spam hits, >> and they have overlapping FPs. The first half isn't a problem, but the >> second half IS. > > They overlap. That is a feature not a design flaw. Overlap generally > means an item is MORE likely to be spam, not less likely.
I don't propose avoiding overlap J.. Read the first post in the thread. I propose that 12 points of score for overlap is too much. Do I have to repeat my entire idea each and every post I make in this blasted thread???
