----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bill Landry wrote:
---- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This makes me wonder if SA wouldn't be better off having some kind of
meta rules
that simply count how many URIBLs the message is listed in, or at
least some
kind of score-limiting feedback on multiple hits. This would allow
lists to
score high individually, but prevent overlapping FPs from being driven
into
astronomical score levels just for containing a single URI that someone
mis-reported to multiple sources.
Thoughts, concepts?
So, Matt, why is this any different than an IP addresses that gets
listed in many different RBLs and reported by SA?
Read the middle of my message, I already pointed that out as being
different.
I read the middle of your message, still don't see the difference.
Bill
