Jason Haar wrote:
I just received a (valid) email notification from a Web service that got
a score of 7/5.
It contained the following scores
2.5 FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML Outlook can't send HTML message only
3.4 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook
That seems a bit of a double-whammy doesn't it? I mean if SA think it's
forged Outlook (the 3.4), then shouldn't the 2.5 be dropped? If that
isn't the case, then why not just give FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK a score of 5.9?
I thought these were different tests?
1) test saying that Outlook can not send HTML only email
2) the MUA header isn't a legitimate OUTLOOK MUA?
IMHO these rules compliment each other
Or am I reading these wrong????
