-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
"Jim C. Nasby" writes: > On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 11:29:36AM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: > > However, looking in the config files, HASHCASH rules have the userconf flag. > > This means that the Autolearner will also ignore these rules too, as SA will > > treat it as a user configured whitelist. > > > > > > So, this message had an autolearner score of +0.135 from the > > FORGED_RCVD_HELO. > > Ahh, so hashcash scores don't actually count towards learning. Should > maybe be changed...? Nah. The idea is that rules where users can conceivably configure SpamAssassin to induce FNs or FPs should be ignored for purposes of auto-learning; we've seen *many* cases where an accidental whitelisting of spam (for example) "polluted" the Bayes db. This was put in place to avoid that problem. > BTW, I was reading http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.hashcash/803 > last night, and I'm wondering if there's been any progress on a way to > enable hashcash without requiring users to supply emails they receive > stamps for? Not yet; none of us are keen to get into that argument^Wdiscussion ;) - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFD6i3yMJF5cimLx9ARAhbsAKCNXlzAi0EYOzn/g81yZ8tSCz4OuwCeMRXr 4FCPKphI7Q6W9RxGKrMVvV8= =4ZcX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
