On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 05:47:36PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: > Jim C. Nasby wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 05:02:25PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: > >> Jim C. Nasby wrote: > >>> On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 04:40:40PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: > >>>> I would also check to make sure you don't have a lot of spam coming in > >>>> that's > >>>> getting autolearned as ham. (note: the learner's idea of score is very > >>>> different > >>>> than the final message score, so a message CAN be tagged as spam, and > >>>> still get > >>>> autolearned as ham) > >>> > >>> What would be the easiest way to do that? Grep through my caughtspam > >>> maildir? > >> That would be the way I'd check.. grep for "autolearn=ham" > > > > Nothing autolearned. > > Nothing autolearned at all? or nothing autolearned as ham? > > Are there any autolearn strings? Are they all "autolearn=no"? are there any > decent number that are autolearn=failed or autolearn=disabled? >
grep -r autolearn caughtspam/ | grep -v 'Binary file' | sed -e 's/.*autolearn=\([^ ]*\).*/\1/'|sort|uniq -c 1545 no 140 spam 4 unavailable -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED] Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
