Hello... I am a complete newbie with
Spamassassin, so I hope you will all bear with me. The job of fixing
our spam filter has fallen on me, as the person who used to handle everything
relating to our mail server recently left my company.
We're running spamassassin 3.0.2 with perl
5.8.4, and exim 3.35 on Debian.
In the last 3 weeks or so , we have started
receiving a ton of spam, especially a lot of pharmeceutical adds and some other
random nonsense. However, Spamassassin isn't completely broken.. it
is actually catching some spam but it's letting a lot go. When I
look at the headers in the spam, I see SA is assigning rediculously low scores
to the ones that are getting through but normal scores to the ones it's
stopping. Some of the spam that is getting through is actually
receving negative scores, which as I understand it shouldn't even be possible
unless the spam is whitelisted somehow.
Here are the SA related headers for a couple of
spams that are getting through:
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10
(Debian) at veritime.com
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on mail2 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=4.9 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_80_90, HTML_MESSAGE,PORN_URL_SEX,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Veritime: Valid X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10
(Debian) at veritime.com
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on mail2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=4.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Veritime: Valid As opposed to this one which is a spam message that
SA caught:
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on mail2 X-Spam-Level: ************* X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=13.2 required=4.9 tests=BAYES_99,DIGEST_MULTIPLE, DRUGS_ERECTILE,DRUG_DOSAGE,DRUG_ED_CAPS,HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR, HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_FONT_SIZE_LARGE,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_SHOUTING5, INVALID_DATE,PYZOR_CHECK,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=spam version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Veritime: Valid X-Spam-Veritime-Spam: True The first thing I did when I was looking at this
was to run spamassassin -lint to see if it was parsing the configuration
file properly and it gave me:
config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line,
skipping: use_terse_report
0
config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: auto_learn 1 lint: 2 issues detected. please rerun with debug enabled for more information. When I looked these up, I found that they were
deprecated options from version 2.6x. At some point SA must
have been updated with a apt-get update or something and the configuration
file was not updated along with it. I'm not sure if this
is the cause of the problem though, since it appears that SA was
updated about a year ago and we've only been having problems with spam for
the last few weeks.
At this point i'm considering just wiping out
spamassassin and reinstalling it fresh and having it relearn all of the
spam that we have been saving for a while but it seems there must be a better
solution.
Does anybody have any ideas on what could be wrong
and how I can fix this? I'm being barraged by spam complaints from our
users and spamassassin isn't trivial to jump right into without knowing
something more about how it works. I've been googling and looking
through docs and not coming up with the answer. Any help is very
much appreciated.
Thanks,
Jeff
|
- spamassissin filter very broken Jeff Portwine
- Re: spamassissin filter very broken Jim Maul
- RE: spamassissin filter very broken Gary V
- Re: spamassissin filter very broken Loren Wilton
- Re: spamassissin filter very broken jdow
- Re: spamassissin filter very broken Gary V
- Re: spamassissin filter very broken Gary V
- Re: spamassissin filter very broken Jeff Portwine
- Re: spamassissin filter very broken Chris Purves
- RE: spamassissin filter very broken Matthew.van.Eerde
- RE: spamassissin filter very broken Bowie Bailey