Jaime,
btw: any special reason you plan to use SA 2.64 with local tests only?
I'd recommend upgrading to the latest and greatest stable version which
can be found (as RPMs for SLES9 on Intel) at
http://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/choeger/spamassassin/i386/sles9/
Take care as the config requires changes in some places.
If you use amavisd-new then enable network tests (or disable the
local-tests-only-option) in the amavis config
HTH
Dirk
Jaime Aguado schrieb:
Hi all, I have spamassassin 2.64 running on a SuSE Enterprise 9 running
postfix as smtpd.
My spamassassin system is leaking most spam messages (60-80%) without
tagging them.
I have done some configuration tests:
# spamassassin --lint gives no output error.
# spamassassin < /tmp/spam-message
[...]
Subject: *****SPAM***** Special Alert to Investors
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 00:22:23 +0000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on
trueno.fresh-it.com
X-Spam-Level: *********
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=9.7 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_99,DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24,
MIME_BASE64_TEXT autolearn=no version=2.64
X-Spam-Report:
* 5.4 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
* [score: 1.0000]
* 1.0 MIME_BASE64_TEXT RAW: Message text disguised using base64
encoding
* 3.3 DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24 Date: is 12 to 24 hours after Received:
date
[...]
# spamc -R < /tmp/spam-message
[...]
Content analysis details: (8.6 points, 4.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
5.4 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
1.0 MIME_BASE64_TEXT RAW: Message text disguised using base64
encoding
2.2 DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24 Date: is 12 to 24 hours after Received: date
The args passed to spamd are: SPAMD_ARGS="-d -c -a -L"
Finally, the message reaches the inbox mail client untagged as spam. What I
am doing wrong?
Thank you.
