Don Levey wrote: > Jim Maul wrote: >> >> Failed means it didnt work for some reason. No means it simply didnt >> even try to autolearn (score wasnt high enough, spam/ham threshold >> not reached, etc.) In short, failed points to a potential problem, >> whereas no doesnt. >> >> -Jim > > That I understood; I'm mentioning the "no" because that means the > autolearn is functioning in at least some cases. The only > differences I'm seeing between the failure and functioning cases are > the actual spam scores. Those with "autolearn=no" seem to score at > least -3.7 or higher, while the "autolearn=failed" show up as -4.8 or > -4.9. -Don
Whoops, spoke too soon. I see an "autolearn=no" with -4.8, and "autolearn=failed" with -2.1, so it's not a problem with a certain score cutoff, or (from what I can tell) specific rules hits. I'm checking logs again... Thanks! -Don
