RE: Spamassassin & Bayes

[Clay Davis]

holy crap!  I'll just take your word for it. :)

>>> On 1/13/2006 at 12:56:36 pm, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Clay Davis wrote:
>> If I only ever sa-learn SPAM and never HAM, will the process
>> eventually assign all "tokens" a high probability?  Likewise, if I
>> have never sa-learn[ed] any HAM will the first message that is
>> sa-learn[ed] as SPAM assign a 1.000 to all tokens processed?   
> 
> No.  See Paul Graham's "A Plan for Spam" essay for gory details.