>On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:58:37 -0500, you wrote: >On 10/01/2006 11:29 AM, George R. Kasica wrote: >>>On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 21:45:11 -0500, you wrote: > >>>Please see, and comment on, bug 4696: >>> >>>http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4696 >>> > >> Just curious as to the estimate for how long it will be until the >> problem is corrected? Right now with the way SA 3.1 is operating here >> it is almost worthless, catching and scanning about 20% of the spam >> due to the bug causing difficulties I'm assuming? > >If you can get a "strace -ftp PID" of the parent spamd process while >this happens (along with a matching debug log) and *attach* it to the >bug, I'm sure Justin would take a look at it. > >I haven't been able to reproduce it myself, so I haven't looked at it >further.
Daryl: Not a programmer here, but with a little direction I think I can get the info. I'm assuming the following here: strace -ftp PID where PID is the PID of the parent spamd process correct? As to debug log, how would I go about that? Is it the info I provided earlier just doing it over again to match with strace output? George George, MR. Tibbs, Nazarene, Ginger/The Beast Kasica(8/1/88-3/19/01, 1/17/02-) Jackson, WI USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netwrx1.com/georgek ICQ #12862186 ("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._ `6_ 6 ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`) (_Y_.)' ._ ) `._ `. ``-..-' _..`--'_..-_/ /--'_.' ,' (il),-'' (li),' ((!.-'
