> Erm, that really shouldn't affect the bayes autolearner.. > perhaps you are > thinking of the AWL? I don't run the AWL for this very reason. >
Oh yeah. I was thinking of the AWL. NM. > The problem is this requires some customization. This can't > be a default setup > of SA as the "catch phrases" vary from place to place, and if > there was a > default set of them spammers would be sure to always include > them, making them > pointless. You'd effectively have the same thing as the > current default, by > avoiding spam rules and existing bayes tokens they can get a > message learned. > That all makes sense. I'll give it a shot. Thanks! -Aaron
