Interesting, I did that just to see how mine were doing and the BAYES one returned 0? Does that mean bayes is not being used? I have been feeding emails to bayes and in debug mode it shows bayes being used. I am using bayes in a mysql. Just weird that its showing 0.
Robert -----Original Message----- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 1:05 PM To: Matthew Yette Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: rules better than bayes? Matthew Yette wrote: > > Do you recommend running airmax as a supplementary ruleset with 3.1.0? I personally have no recommendations on it.. I've never run it. I personally like SARE's specific, evilnumbers, random and adult rulesets. Here's some quick grep's for hit-rates on some SARE rules I use (no declarations about FPs vs real spam hits, but none of these sets have caused me any problems so far) 70_sare_evilnum0.cf & 70_sare_evilnum1.cf: grep SARE_EN_ /var/log/maillog |wc -l 301 70_sare_specific.cf: grep SARE_SPEC_ /var/log/maillog |wc -l 60 70_sare_genlsubj0.cf: grep SARE_SUB /var/log/maillog |wc -l 44 70_sare_adult.cf: grep SARE_ADLT /var/log/maillog |wc -l 31 70_sare_uri0.cf: grep SARE_URI_ /var/log/maillog |wc -l 10 70_sare_random.cf: grep SARE_RAND_ /var/log/maillog |wc -l 1 I also strongly recommend enabling SA's URIBL support, and adding on a .cf file to get uribl.com's list added in (default SA only uses surbl.org lists) grep URIBL_BLACK /var/log/maillog |wc -l 2214 grep _SURBL /var/log/maillog |wc -l 2144 And of course I get great results from bayes: grep BAYES_99 /var/log/maillog |wc -l 2190 Ditto DCC and Razor2: grep RAZOR2_CHECK /var/log/maillog |wc -l 2114 grep DCC_CHECK /var/log/maillog |wc -l 1833
