On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 04:02:27PM -0300, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
> full __RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_81_100 eval:check_razor2_range('','81','100')
> full __RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_81_100
> eval:check_razor2_range('4','81','100')
> full __RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_81_100
> eval:check_razor2_range('8','80','100')
> meta RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_81_100 __RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_81_100 ||
> __RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_81_100 || __RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_81_100
>
> Question ...... will these rules work as expected ???There's no point to have the meta rule. __RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_81_100 will hit when any engine gives a confidence level in that range. The E4/E8 rules are there so you could give a higher score to a specific engine if you thought it performed better than the others. ie: 8 is for uri/domains which may work better than message hashing which is 4, so you could bump the score up specifically for 8. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "I am Bob Barker of Borg. You will come on down."
pgpojyg6RGlHY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
