That loks like it, is there anyway of having a different report if the mail is identified as spam cf identified as ham?
On Thu, 2005-29-12 at 20:16 +0100, Patrick von der Hagen wrote: > tom wright wrote: > > This dosnt seem to have solved the issue. I'm using the > > exiscan-acl-4.42-27.patch (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan-acl/) so exim > > send mails direct to spamassassin at smtp time. I'm no expert here but > > looking at the code it seems that this passes the message direct to > > spamd. > > You probably did something like this: > > # Always put X-Spam-Report header in the message. > # This is a multiline header that informs the user > # which tests a message has "hit", and how much a > # test has contributed to the score. > warn message = X-Spam-Report: $spam_report > condition = ${if <{$message_size}{80k}{1}{0}} > spam = nobody:true > > You will always get a X-Spam-Report-Header in your emails to prove that > the email has been scaned and (in the case of a false-negative) to > explain why it was not considered to be spam. > > If you need more support, please provide your exim-ACL which refer to > spamassassin.
