Loren Wilton a écrit : >>Does anyone have any suggestions, apart from simply reducing the score >>for SARE_URI_EQUALS? Is this a spamassassin bug, or is there no way to >>guarantee that only real uris are parsed as such? > > > Several. > > 1. Change your report generator to remove the extraneous dot between > updated and by. Or change it to the more common underscore, if you insist > on these words being connected for some reason. > > 2. Put spaces around the equal sign. > > 3. If you are reluctant for the correct fix, drop the score on the > uri_equals rule to 4 or maybe 3, depending on what else your report manages > to hit. > > 4. You could submit a Bugzilla on the parsing of that phrase. But > frankly I consider the bug in the report generation, not SA's parsing of > strange syntax. >
Is foo.tld=bar a valid hostname part in a URI? I doubt that. now, would a MUA show that as a URI followed by "bar"? I think that SA should provide an option to enable/disable: uri_broken_mua, so that people not caring for "broken" MUAs can avoid such false positives.
