On Monday 19 December 2005 11:22, Liviu Lalescu wrote: >Dear All, > >I have problems with the attached e-mail. I am attaching the > spamassassin processed e-mail, and the original version of the > e-mail (this is obtained from the processed e-mail by removing the > spamassassin part).
Looking at the message, I'd sure call it spam, based on the buzzword contents alone. But the killer is probably the fact that the senders computer doesn't care enough to properly set the time, note that high score on that point alone. ntpd is easily setup, even on a windahz box I think. And that guarantees time within a small fraction of a second to standard time. >Spamassassin is reporting it as spam, with a score of 5.6, but it is > surely not spam. I have also used a "sa-learn --ham" on it, but even > after that the message is still flagged as spam. I have done > "sa-learn --ham timetabling" and after that "spamassassin -t < > timetabling >timetabling.out", obtaining also a 5.6 score. > >I am using SpamAssassin 3.1.0 on Slackware GNU/Linux, with KMail > 1.8.1. I did not modify any default options from SpamAssassin. > >I can mention that I have used learning (sa-learn) for about 8000 ham > messages and for 14 spam messages. -- Cheers, Gene People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should use this address: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> which bypasses vz's stupid bounce rules. I do use spamassassin too. :-) Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
