I think it was a mistake on our part by using the same name for i/p and o/p.
regards ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: spamassassin 3.1.0 test gives error Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:29:45 -0500 > > Theo Van Dinter wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 01:28:07PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: > > > >>> spamassassin -t < sample-nonspam.txt > sample-nonspam.txt > >> > >> Why'd you direct the output back to sample-nonspam.txt? If SA isn't working > >> you'll corrupt the file. > > > > > > Beyond that, I don't even know if it'll work. In all likelihood, the shell > > will truncate the file and prep it for output while also opening > > it for input, > > then run spamassassin which will then have a blank file. > > Verified. My sa 3.1.0 works normally with: > > spamassassin -t <sample-nonspam.txt >out.txt > > and generates all the same errors as B.G. Mahesh when I do: > > spamassassin -t <out.txt >out.txt > > > B.G. Mahesh, I suggest trying your test again with the output directed to a > different file, or /dev/null, not the same file as the input. > > spamassassin -t <sample-nonspam.txt >out.txt > > or > > spamassassin -t <sample-nonspam.txt >/dev/null -- B.G. Mahesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.indiainfo.com/ -- ______________________________________________ IndiaInfo Mail - the free e-mail service with a difference! www.indiainfo.com Check out our value-added Premium features, such as an extra 20MB for mail storage, POP3, e-mail forwarding, and ads-free mailboxes!
