* Jo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-04 13:13]:
> Alan Gutierrez wrote:
> 
> >I'd like to install SpamAssassin in Postfix to filter spam for a
> >Domino mail server. I'd like to use Bayesian filtering.
> >
> >How have people solved the problem of training the filter with user
> >feedback when SpamAssassin is running at the MTA?
> >
> >The idea I'm entertaining is wrapping spam messages, delivering them
> >as attachments, which SA will do already, and having a Reply-To
> >address of "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", or if it is a false negative,
> >forward the unwrapped message to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
> >
> >Then the MTA can teach SA that bit of mail.
> >
> >Any insight would be greatly appreciated.

> What you describe is exactly what we are doing here. 
> Postfix/Amavisd-new/Spamassassin filters the mail before it's relayed 
> onto the domino mail server. We created two extra mail boxes, one for 
> spam and one for ham. Two buttons were added to the user interface which 
> move the messages to these boxes respectively. Then we switched on POP 
> on the Notes server. We use kmail to fetch the mails and they 
> automagically get converted to the standard mailbox format again. (while 
> in Notes, they are stored in a proprietary Notes format). Once you 
> locate the kmail mailboxes it becomes trivial to write a script to 
> process them with sa-learn.

> A manual step is involved though. Maybe it's possible to automate it 
> entirely with another mail client instead of kmail. I like to have a 
> look at what people tag as spam though, before it gets learned.

Yes, it helps. I'm fortunate in that the Domino mangement will be
performed by someone who's particularly good at Notes development. I
need to get a fix on what Domino can do, and that's why I ask.

Apparently, there's already a "Spam" box on these Domino clients and
a macro to add mail to the "Spam" box. Using your solution with
fetchmail instead of kmail, I can automate training of  SA via IMAP or POP.

But, "Ham" is confusing. I'd suspect that a user would want to
retain control of folder names, rather than lumping everything of
value into a "Ham" folder.

Am I correct in assuming that the user puts mail in the "Ham" folder
only if it has been incorrectly marked as "Spam"? Then I suppose
you're running auto-learn maybe, and the "Ham" folder corrects?

Thanks for the hand-holding, this is all new stuff to me.

--
Alan Gutierrez - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://engrm.com/blogometer/

Reply via email to