Ron Johnson wrote: > Matt Kettler writes: > >>At 10:33 AM 11/30/2005, Ron Johnson wrote: >> >> >>>Matt Kettler writes: >>> >>>>At 09:36 PM 11/29/2005, mouss wrote: >>>> >>>>>it would be good to make the file empty, only containing this info. this >>>>>way, even those who miss this message (and the previous one) still have a >>>>>chance to get the info. >>>> >>>>Yes, but there are still users out there that aren't using SA 3.0.x due to >>>>perl version problems. For them, I still wish to make the file available. >>>> >>>> >>> >>>How about a pre-3.0 version (last meaningful version) and post-3.0 >>>(mouss's suggestion) >> >>Is that mouss's suggestion? I read his message as suggesting that I >>wipe-out the contents of antidrug.cf and replace it with a notice. >> > > Sorry, Ron needs an editor. > > What I was suggesting was. > > a) pre-3.0 (last meaningful version) > b) post-3.0 (no contents beyond a notification message -- as mouss > suggested) >
Ron, I understood you. What I don't understand is if that's what mouss is suggesting. As previously said, I read mouss as suggesting I empty antidrug.cf. I did not read you as suggesting this.
