jdow a écrit :
They use a commercial product, I believe. The trick would be to find out which one. (I have forgotten the name.) A request to the filter vendor might do some good.) (I learned early on that for most cases using Earthlink's spam filter was not a good thing. I hear it has gotten better with time. But the early aversion therapy seems to have stuck.)
well, I don't know. I just know that many of the messages I sent you (I do "reply to all") were rejected by verizon.net. and the messages said to contact an address, which I tried, in vain... but I don't feel blocking verizon.*...
same for sorbs. sorbs have listed the postfix server twice this year, and it seems their duhl is arbitrary (see dnsstuff url that I posted before, but I have other "evidences"). so while I appreciate the efforts that sorbs do to fight spam, and I understand that it's not an easy battle, I won't accept a solution that destroys the benefits of email. getting "somewhere" is silly. getting one step beyond is good.
some BLs are well maintained (as of now: cbl, ordb, dsbl, sbl, opm, njabl-*; ahbl-*). some are aggressive but well-defined (spamcops). some are unrelated to spam but well-defined (rfci). some seem arbitrary to me (sorbs, ...). others are plain silly (blars).
