RE: Rule for this

[Casey King]

Title: Message

I do understand that the trusted hosts needs to be fixed, but not being fully in control, I am not allowed to do this.  I have had this discussion with the Senior Admin.  I am running SA 3.1, and yes I do have an antidrug rule in place.  I am currently looking for a more up to date antidrug rule b/c the one I have has not updated since 4/28/04.  So I know I need to get this changed.  Here is a list of the rules I am currently running.   TRIPWIRE  ANTIDRUG  EVILNUMBERS  BLACKLIST_URI  RANDOMVAL  BOGUSVIRUS  SARE_ADULT  SARE_FRAUD  SARE_BML SARE_SPOOF SARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM SARE_OEM SARE_RANDOM  SARE_HEADER_ABUSE SARE_SPECIFIC SARE_CODING_HTML SARE_GENLSUBJ SARE_UNSUB SARE_URI0  SARE_REDIRECT_POST300 SARE_SPAMCOP_TOP200 SARE_OBFU -----Original Message----- From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 4:55 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Rule for this First, fix your trusted hosts.  You shoudln't be trusting a DSL line on some other system.   Second, you don't mention what version of SA you are using, nor what rules files you are using.  It looks like you don't have antidrug rules, which would imply 2.6x.  In any case some of the SARE rules would probably have caught this, and probably th ebuilt-in antidrug rules in 3.x.           Loren