I get a similar score now, when they first came in they didn't hit any of
the SURBL or RAZOR rules so it scored very low. I was looking for a way to
hit the scheme they are using before they make it into the various block
lists. I had quite a few on several servers in just a few min.

I wrote a sequence of meta rules that seem to catch it well and they didn't
get any FPs with mass-check, but they didn't get any hits either (using
spam, spam_2 and hard_ham). I assume since they didn't get hits on the
public corpus but hit every one I have actually recieved this is a fairly
new trick. I guess I will just watch them for a while and see how they do in
real life.

Rick

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kai Schaetzl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 12:31 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Clever Spammers, Anything to catch this?
>
>
> Doesn't score that bad (I removed the hits on missing ehader stuff).
>
>         *  2.1 BAYES_95 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 95 to 99%
>         *      [score: 0.9854]
>         *  1.7 SARE_SPEC_LEO_LINE04 RAW: common Leo body text
>         *  1.5 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
>         *      [URIs: seltagook.com]
>         *  3.0 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL
> blocklist
>         *      [URIs: seltagook.com]
>         *  2.0 URIBL_XS_SURBL Has URI in XS - Testing
>         *      [URIs: seltagook.com]
>         *  0.4 URIBL_AB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the AB SURBL
> blocklist
>         *      [URIs: seltagook.com]
>         *  3.0 URIBL_SC2_SURBL Has URI in SC2 SURBL list
>         *      [URIs: seltagook.com]
>         *  4.0 URIBL_SC_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the SC SURBL
> blocklist
>         *      [URIs: seltagook.com]
>         *  0.0 UPPERCASE_50_75 message body is 50-75% uppercase
>
>
> Kai
>
> --
> Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
> Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
> IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
>
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


Reply via email to