At 01:18 14/11/2005, mouss wrote:
Jeff Chan a écrit :
Does anyone have a geocities rule that catches most of the spams
and has few FPs?
after looking at many of these, I ended up just
giving 4 points to any
http://*.geocities.com/*/? (written as perl expression of course).
together with Bayes and other tests, this seems
to block all that spam (I didn't need to block all the geocities.com URLs).
FPs are theoritically possible, though I didn't
see legitimate geocities pages with the "/?" pattern.
- A large number of these come from IPs with no rDNS
- many come from Asian networks.
so it may be good to mix multiple checks together to reduce FPs.
Hi,
I don't suppose you could post your rules for
this for those of us not well versed in perl
regex's ? :-) Those spams are driving us crazy
and they're about the only ones that are slipping
through 3.0.4. I'm also running 3.1.0 on test and
it's no better (in fact worse) at detecting these...
Regards,
Simon
