Klaus Heinz wrote:
is the test t/spf.t from SA 3.1.0 supposed to succeed? All the
SPF_HELO_* tests fail for me (Mail-SPF-Query 1.996 or 1.997,
Net-DNS-0.49).
t/spf.... Not found: helo_pass = SPF_HELO_PASS
t/spf....ok 2/8 Not found: helo_neutral = SPF_HELO_NEUTRAL
t/spf....ok 4/8 Not found: helo_softfail = SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL
t/spf....ok 7/8 Not found: helo_fail = SPF_HELO_FAIL
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t/spf.t 8 4 50.00% 1 3 5 8
I am aware of the fact that the behaviour of 3.0.x regarding SPF was
considered wrong and thus changed for 3.1.0 but I would expect the tests
to be adapted accordingly.
ciao
Klaus
Yeah, the tests weren't updated when that change was made. It probably
went un-noticed due to the bug in Sys::Hostname::Long which prevents us
from running the test on a lot of systems.
If you'd like to open a bug at http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/
it'll get fixed.
Daryl
