Cami wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Cami wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Cami wrote:
I'm not treating them as such. All I'm trying to do is stop
RBL checks happening for the 196.0.0.0/8 network.
trusted_networks 196.0.0.0/8 165.165.0.0/16 165.146.0.0/16
internal_networks 196.2.50.0/24
I have done so, yet i still fail to see how the behavior mimics that
of SA 2.64, both hosts in my trusted_networks and internal_network
still get checked against RBLs.
Perhaps you'd consider sharing a copy of the received headers from an
affected message so that we can do more than guess.
Received: from anemone.mweb.co.za (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by pwfilter01.mweb.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1982039F
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 05:12:28 +0200 (SAST)
You failed to trust 127.0.0.1.
Daryl
