Fred wrote: > Hrmm something is wrong here, I updated this file on 10/14/2005 the very > first day I seen this sign. What date are you showing on your copy of the > random file? > > I also updated this file this morning to increase the score for this rule > but I forgot to change the last modified date and also forgot to do the > version #.. I just resent the file with updated version numbers 10 minutes > ago, the rule has been here for 10 days, it's called: > header SARE_RAND_NAME1 ALL =~ /%(?:NAME|MAIL)_(?:FROM|TO)/ > score SARE_RAND_NAME1 3.455 >
Sorry fred, This is two cases of "my bad". First, I was foolish enough to trust the date on the rulesemporium website, which claims the last update was a year and a half ago: Created by: Fred Tarasevicius with contributions (too many to list!) License Type: Artistic/GPL dual Status: Active * Last update: 2004-05-17 Version: 01.30.01 (from http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm) The file itself has been updated. My local version hasn't been updated recently, since when I browse rulesemporium.com it tells me there is no update to be had. Second, even though I looked at the copy on the rulesemporium website, I failed to notice the date mismatch, and failed to notice the new rule despite searching for it. (I searched for NAME_, which wouldn't find the above). Suggested action item for SARE: If you can't synch the "Last Update" for rules.htm, with the files, remove it. It's better to say nothing than to present blatantly wrong information.
