| qqqq wrote: | >I finally took the leap to SA 3.1 but am confused as to why the SA | >X-Headers are prepended to the message and not appeneded like the | >previous versions. This is causing havoc on my Blackberry. Is this | >normal? | | What kind of havoc? I haven't heard of any issues from the Blackberry | users I know. | | Does your mail first go through a Windows based mail system?
No but here is what the headers look like: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on domain.com X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.2 tests=BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=0.231,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no version=3.1.0 >From mailnull Thu Oct 20 23:42:08 2005 Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ccm08.roving.com (ccm08.roving.com [63.251.135.109]) etc....etc....etc..... I looked at my older messages and they all start with the Return-Path header. Based on RFC 822, the X-Headers are supposed to be after the crucial info. QQQQ
