Chris Santerre a écrit :
I understand that. But his reason is because surbl isn't catching
everything. Using the two lists he will catch a lot more. And with URIBL he
can contribute domains missed and have them added in minutes. Helping the
entire community. No sense in him reinventing the wheel.
One might blocks URIs on a site basis. an example is the geocities case,
when one may want to block it until yahoo solve the problem. but there
are other cases. I get spam from some NLs that have bad/inexistent
optin/optout, but that other people may want to receive, so these won't
be listed.
of course, I can add rules to do so, but this is less manageable than a
local dnsbl (modifying rules require restarting daemons that use SA, ...
etc).
