-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

hi daryl,

> We'll probably have to adapt to the changed API (which may change again
> before a 1.0 version).  I'm not familiar with the API, and haven't
> looked at it, though.  I'm just recalling what Theo posted last Sunday.

that said -- i'e, the "we'll ..." -- could *you*, kindly, (re)raise the issue 
with Theo?  i
can;t contribute much on this one, and i's sure you/he/others don't need my 
'noise'!

pls lemme know if i *can* help.

cheers,

richard
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (Darwin)

iEYEAREDAAYFAkNR1DIACgkQGnqMy4gvZ6FoFQCeNKhlzykIlWjsSbSadmV6kahO
oF4An3yKwvewBs8pfwbeUFytx/yk9i4b
=+Sty
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to