Linda A. Walsh wrote: > 6.86 msgs/sec? Wazup? Used to take about a tenth of that time, > though > it did jump up in 3.0x over 2.6x. But 7 msgs/second? That seems > abysmally slow compared to previous runtimes. Might as well be > running on a 286. (2x1GHz P-III's w/1GB, 15K-RPM SCSI system disk, a > bit old, but not _that_ old...).
Are you using BerkeleyDB-based Bayes databases? If those have gotten huge, that could explain the slowdown. Perhaps a SQL-daemon-based Bayes database is worth considering? -- Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902 Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
