wolfgang wrote:
In an older episode (Friday, 30. September 2005 20:56), Matt Kettler wrote:
Attached is a subset of some porn rules I've been working on. They're
experimental, but the seem to work pretty well with fairly low FP rate.
They might have some FP cases I haven't noticed yet, so be careful with
them,
but you might want to try them out.
Thanks, they look promising, one problem tho:
after adding them, --lint gives me:
Failed to run meta SpamAssassin tests, skipping some: syntax error at (eval
64) line 547, near ") {"
syntax error at (eval 64) line 634, near ";
}"
in two different 3.0.4 installations. Maybe you find the problem faster than i
could (and want to :)
cheers,
Failed to run meta SpamAssassin tests, skipping some: syntax error at
(eval 62) line 830, near ") {"
syntax error at (eval 62) line 1288, near ";
}"
make that 2 of us getting the same error on SA 3.0.4
- dhawal
