On Samstag, 24. September 2005 06:14 email builder wrote: > No. Please understand that there is a difference between using SORBS > in the MTA (ala Postfix's smtpd_recipient_restrictions) where a > listing equates to an immediate rejection and using SORBS in SA for > scoring. You are referring to the latter. I have said many times > that the thread was about the former. I don't think anyone disagrees > with using SORBS in SA scoring.
ACK. Sorry, didn't read the whole thread. We also use RBLs in postfix, but only "secure" ones that don't make false positives. Currently, we use these since January 2005 without any problems: sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, dnsbl.njabl.org, bl.spamcop.net, dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net, zombie.dnsbl.sorbs.net, web.dnsbl.sorbs.net, smtp.dnsbl.sorbs.net, relays.ordb.org So we have 4 SORBS zones, none causing problems. Sometimes, there are customers of our customers who are in a "dul" (dial up link) network running their own mail server, and we just force them to use the mail server of their ISP to send mail to our server. Sometimes a bit of work, but we have a strict commitmend on that. If you are on a DUL network, you must use the mail server of your ISP, at least as a relay. No discussion about that. mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc --- it-management Michael Monnerie // http://zmi.at Tel: 0660/4156531 Linux 2.6.11 // PGP Key: "lynx -source http://zmi.at/zmi2.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: EB93 ED8A 1DCD BB6C F952 F7F4 3911 B933 7054 5879 // Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x70545879
pgpFaG9J6L63i.pgp
Description: PGP signature
