From: Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to disable AWL in ~/.user_prefs
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:59:47 -0400

> MATSUDA Yoh-ichi wrote:
> > Hello, spamassassiners.
> > 
> > I have upgraded SA 3.1.0 im my Debian box, using my scamping patch.
> > 
> > Yesterday, the spammer sent me a tricky spam.
> > The spammer wrote my mail address at "From:" field in the spam.
> > SA's AWL has been confused.
> 
> Are you sure? Did you actually verify that it got confused by this?

Yes.

> If so, is your trusted_networks configured properly?

Oops! (x_x;)

> SA's AWL needs trusted_networks to work properly, otherwise spoofing (such as
> this) can confuse it.

I didn't know!

> > <Questions>
> > 1. Is there any solution to the above problem using AWL?
> 
> In general it looks like spamassassin -W and --add-to-blacklist are broken. 
> This
> is probably because -W and --add-to-blacklist work on email-address only.
> However, message scanning uses a combination of From: and IP address.
> 
> So I guess the real question is what's the problem that caused you to try to 
> use
> these features in the first place? The spammer's forgery shouldn't count 
> against
> your emails, since he'd be from a different IP address. If trusted_networks is
> set correctly, SA will see the difference.

OK, now I've setuped trusted_networks and tested hams and spams again.

...good! SA's AWL works properly!

Matt-san, Thanks a lot!

> > 2. If the solutions of 1. is nothing, I have to disable AWL function.
> >    So, how to disable AWL in personal setting (~/.spamassassin/user_prefs) ?
> 
> You can't. Enabling the AWL can affect mailserver disk usage and CPU usage, so
> it's best to not let users turn it on and off.
> 
> >    I couldn't find out AWL switch in SA's documents.
> >    Is AWL function setting only systemwide /etc/spamassassin/v310.pre ?
> 
> In SA 3.1.0 this is the only way I know of.
> 
> Previous versions had a "use_auto_whitelist" config option, but it was
> privileged and would only be honored in site-wide configs (local.cf) and would
> be ignored in user_prefs anyway.
> 

Hmm, I remembered "use_auto_whitelist", and I didn't know the information.
Matt-san, thanks again.
--
Nothing but a peace sign.
MATSUDA Yoh-ichi(yoh)
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.flcl.org/~yoh/diary/ (only Japanese)

Reply via email to