On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 03:17 -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> Maurice Lucas wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I have a problem with both 3.1.0-rc1 and 3.1.0-rc2.
> > 
> > Some off my mail is checked by SA and marked as spam but gets an extra 
> > LF causing the rest of my tools to ignore the X-Spam-Status header field.
> 
> That's weird, X-Spam headers from 3.1 should be above a received header. 
>   Does all of your mail have its X-Spam headers appended to the end of 
> the existing headers?

No and yes below is your message and some other spam of yesterday

The main difference is in the lines
ham:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0-rc2 (2005-08-27) on 
        MUNGLED
X-Spam-Level: 

Spam:
Received: from localhost by MUNGLED with SpamAssassin (version
3.1.0-rc2);
        Wed, 14 Sep 2005 03:38:25 +0200

The spam mail is received by SA while the ham is only checked by

------
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 19001 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2005 07:16:58 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 18998 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2005 07:16:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO MUNGLED) (MUNGLED) by
        MUNGLED with SMTP; 14 Sep 2005 07:16:58 -0000
Received: (qmail 8858 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2005 07:17:22 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0-rc2 (2005-08-27) on 
        MUNGLED
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
        version=3.1.0-rc2
Received: from MUNLED (MUNGLED [MUNGLED]) by
        MUNGLED ([MUNGLED]) with ESMTP via TCP; 14 Sep 2005
        07:17:22 -0000
Received: from MUNGLED
        (MUNGLED [MUNGLED]) (authenticated user
        MUNGLED) by MUNGLED (MUNGLED
        [MUNGLED]) (Cipher TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (MDaemon.PRO.v6.8.5.R)
with
        ESMTP id 63-md50000000118.tmp for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 14 Sep
2005
        02:17:16 -0500
Received: from [MUNGLED] ([MUNGLED]) (authenticated bits=0)
        by MUNGLED (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id
        j8E7HEKK014456 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA
bits=256
        verify=NO); Wed, 14 Sep 2005 03:17:14 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 03:17:13 -0400
From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Maurice Lucas 
CC: Spamassassin 
Subject: Re: SA 3.1.0-rc1 and rc2: Extra LF in headers
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Authenticated-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-MDRemoteIP: MUNGLED
X-Return-Path: MUNGLED
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: MUNGLED
-------------

SPAM message
-------------
Return-Path:
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 9032 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2005 01:38:01 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 9029 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2005 01:38:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO MUNGLED) (MUNGLED) by
        MUNGLED with SMTP; 14 Sep 2005 01:38:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 23704 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2005 01:38:25 -0000
Received: from localhost by MUNGLED with SpamAssassin (version
3.1.0-rc2);
        Wed, 14 Sep 2005 03:38:25 +0200
From: Earline Aguilar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ****SPAM(11.5)**** Become an employee of our company.
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:42:16 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0-rc2 (2005-08-27) on 
        capella.taos-it.nl
X-Spam-Level: ***********
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=11.5 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_00=-2.599,
        RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.558,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL=1.946,
        RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=2.046,RCVD_IN_WHOIS_BOGONS=2.43,
        RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID=2.234,RCVD_IN_XBL=3.897,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 
        autolearn=no version=3.1.0-rc2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_43277F11.58AE5373"

With kind regards,
Maurice Lucas

Reply via email to