He's more aggressive than I am. For him spam is 4.6. For me it's 5.0 and
I only score BAYES_99 at 5.0 points.
{^_-}
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, M.Lewis wrote:
Also what did you use to get the report?
The report shows up in most setups in any spam email. Considering this
one scored the way it did, I'm pretty sure it scored as spam.
-Dan
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Thu, 26 May 2005, Loren Wilton wrote:
I'm not going to try running that, but I've got a pile of rules that
catch
stock scams like that. SARE has a good bunch of them, the better ones
of
course.
Here, the most recent spam I got was a stock spam. It hit:
1.8 LOCAL_OBFU_GENERIC BODY: Obfuscated 'GENERIC' in body
0.6 J_CHICKENPOX_48 BODY: 4alpha-pock-8alpha
0.5 FB_INVEST_ADVICE BODY: /invest.{1,15}advice/i
1.7 SARE_FWDLOOK BODY: Forward looking statements about
stocks
0.6 J_CHICKENPOX_71 BODY: 7alpha-pock-1alpha
1.0 LW_LOAN BODY: /\bl.?o.?a.?n\b/i
1.1 FB_SAVE_PERSC BODY:
/sav(?:e|ing).{1,45}p[re][re]scription/i
2.0 LW_OTCBB BODY: Reference to stock
1.0 LW_1933 BODY: Reference to Securities Act
0.7 SARE_MONEYTERMS BODY: Talks about money in some way.
0.6 J_CHICKENPOX_53 BODY: 5alpha-pock-3alpha
2.7 NOT_ADVISOR BODY: Not registered investment advisor
0.3 SARE_MILLIONSOF BODY: Millions of something.
0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
5.4 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to
100%
[score: 1.0000]
0.9 FM_NO_STYLE FM_NO_STYLE
Loren,
Where can I find those LW_* rules? Or are they part of your private
collection?
-Dan
