From a direct mail answer to him:
=======8<--------
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
host nssa.netcore.co.in [202.162.240.37]: 554 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Sender address rejected: Access denied
=======8<--------
Scroom - not interested in discussing it with him further. If he
feels Earthlink.net is worthy of blacklisting then he's a fugghead
unworthy of consideration.
{^_^}
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ramprasad A Padmanabhan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: 2005 August, 16, Tuesday 00:21
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: SpamAssassin 3.1.0-rc1 release candidate available!
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 05:31, jdow wrote:
From: "Kenneth Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> --On Saturday, August 13, 2005 6:58 PM -0400 Theo Van Dinter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 03:07:14PM +0530, Ramprasad A Padmanabhan
>> wrote:
>>> When I build the rpm from the spec file ( on fedora core 3 ) the
>>> spamassassin-tools rpm is not created. Was it not a part of SA.
>>
>> The tools RPM was deprecated. There was very little in there that
>> wasn't
>> development related, which is better taken out of SVN or the tarball,
>> so ...
>
> I'd recommend adding an Obsoletes tag for the deprecated subpackage,
> then.
> Otherwise the 3.0.4 subpackage gets orphaned and blocks updating of the
> surviving subpackages.
What sub-packages that a CPAN style update won't catch?
CPAN style updates are not good for System Adminstrators , who find it
easier to create rpm, scp to all the machines and run rpm -Uvh for all.
Especially when you have more than 7-8 machines to manage
Ram
