M> 10 BAYES_99 15351 4.46% 45.42% 60.57% M> 19 BAYES_50 6443 1.87% 19.06% 25.42% M> 31 BAYES_80 1154 0.34% 3.41% 4.55% M> 32 BAYES_60 1147 0.33% 3.39% 4.53% M> 38 BAYES_95 864 0.25% 2.56% 3.41% M> 102 BAYES_00 187 0.05% 0.55% 0.74% M> 152 BAYES_40 92 0.03% 0.27% 0.36% M> 209 BAYES_20 53 0.02% 0.16% 0.21% M> 228 BAYES_05 44 0.01% 0.13% 0.17% M> M>For ham... M> 2 BAYES_00 6959 15.73% 20.59% 82.32% M> 9 BAYES_50 623 1.41% 1.84% 7.37% M> 20 BAYES_40 296 0.67% 0.88% 3.50% M> 24 BAYES_20 267 0.60% 0.79% 3.16% M> 29 BAYES_05 217 0.49% 0.64% 2.57% M> 73 BAYES_60 51 0.12% 0.15% 0.60% M> 113 BAYES_99 24 0.05% 0.07% 0.28% M> 142 BAYES_80 14 0.03% 0.04% 0.17% M> 280 BAYES_95 2 0.00% 0.01% 0.02% M> M>So, BAYES_99 hits 0.28% of my ham and 60.57% of my spam. M>
You must have a different version to the one now available because your missing one column Spam RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM ------------------------------------------------------------ 1 BAYES_99 468 5.94 75.48 97.91 329.58 2 RAZOR2_CHECK 422 5.35 68.06 88.28 297.18 3 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 421 5.34 67.90 88.08 296.48 4 URIBL_BLACK 353 4.48 56.94 73.85 248.59 The %ofham column is obviously wrong but the others seem fine Ham RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM ------------------------------------------------------------ 1 BAYES_00 137 37.33 22.10 28.66 96.48 2 AWL 112 30.52 18.06 23.43 78.87 3 HTML_MESSAGE 16 4.36 2.58 3.35 11.27 7 UPPERCASE_25_50 9 2.45 1.45 1.88 6.34 8 URIBL_BLACK 5 1.36 0.81 1.05 3.52 Again the Spam column is wrong here and should be ignored, nice to see whats false positiving so I can lower scores accordingly. Martin
