Thanks for the info.

I fixed that Received line, by removing the line wrap, and it was no
longer ALL_TRUSTED.

Now that I know what the issue is, I just need to figure out why the
header is getting munged.

Thanks,
John

> John T. Yocum wrote:
>> Thanks. I tried adding the /32 to the end, but that didn't have an
>> effect.
>> I did run the headers through spamassassin -D and got the following.
>>
>> debug: received-header: unknown format: from U075209.ppp.dion.ne.jp
>> (U075209.ppp.dion.ne.jp
>> debug: metadata: X-Spam-Relays-Trusted:
>> debug: metadata: X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted:
>>
>> Thus, it was tagged as ALL_TRUSTED.
>>
>> What is really odd, is this only happens to direct delivered mail, any
>> message relayed via another host, doesn't get the ALL_TRUSTED flag.
>>
>
> Well, that much makes sense. SA can't parse the Received: headers your
> server
> generates, but it can parse ones generated by outside servers. Thus,
> outside
> mail with another relay will show up as having been through an untrusted
> host.
>
>
> The problem you need to track down is why can't SA parse your Received:
> headers.
>
> Based on the debug output you got it could be an issue with line-wrap
> formating.
>
> At casual glance, the headers you quoted look correct, but it's impossible
> to
> tell if they're really correct because they've been copy-pasted into an
> email
> message which adds line wraps.
>
>
> To check that, you need to look at a set of pristine message headers, not
> a
> copy-paste of them, in a hex editor. (The process of copy-pasting can
> change
> linewrap formats, replace tabs with spaces, and other sundry things that
> would
> matter here).
>
> One thing I can tell you is that there MUST NOT be a linewrap between the
> end of
> the RDNS hostname and the [ for the IP address.
>
> This quotation should be only 3 lines long:
>
> Received: from U075209.ppp.dion.ne.jp (U075209.ppp.dion.ne.jp
> [218.222.75.209])
>      by kangaroo.publicmx.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6OKabJS014331
>      for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:36:40 -0700
>
>
> But I'm assuming the extra linewrap after .jp was added by your mail
> client.
>

Reply via email to