jdow wrote:
From: "Jeff Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Is this correct as ammended? I added the "TXT" strings


Here are SpamAssassin 3.0.1 and later configs for using these two lists:



urirhsbl  URIBL_SC2_SURBL  sc2.surbl.org.   TXT
body      URIBL_SC2_SURBL  eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SC2_SURBL')
describe  URIBL_SC2_SURBL  Has URI in SC2 at http://www.surbl.org/lists.html
tflags    URIBL_SC2_SURBL  net

score     URIBL_SC2_SURBL  3.0

urirhsbl  URIBL_XS_SURBL   xs.surbl.org.   TXT
body      URIBL_XS_SURBL   eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_XS_SURBL')
describe  URIBL_XS_SURBL   Has URI in XS - Testing
tflags    URIBL_XS_SURBL   net

score     URIBL_XS_SURBL   2.0


This passes lint, at least.

{^_^}


Another --lint test pass on this one, and both Jeff's varients fail to parse on SA 3.0.4 for me.

--
--
Martin Hepworth
Senior Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic Ltd
tel: +44 (0)1865 842300

**********************************************************************

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean.       

**********************************************************************

Reply via email to